Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobe Bryant (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 01:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Kobe Bryant (song)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

May "possibly" be the third single of an "upcoming" album. My redirects to the album page until such a time as this really is a single, and meets the criteria at WP:SONG, keep getting reverted. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SLOBBERINGFANBOY. That's it, I'm writing that. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am keenly looking forward to the WP:SLOBBERINGFANBOY essay. Rlendog (talk) 22:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect then protect the redirect. no need for deletion. Umbralcorax (talk) 21:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - The article does cite two relevant sources (I'm not counting the ones for scores of Laker games), so it may have notability. Probably merge with the album is the most suitable option until the single is released (if it is) or until more sources can be found to expand the article. Rlendog (talk) 22:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 00:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep for now, the two reliables are good enough to keep it for now in my opinion, however if it doesnt become a single a redirect might be better. --neon white talk 00:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.