Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobolds in gaming (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:37, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Kobolds in gaming
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced OR. Nothing but a list of trivia. Does not seem like an individually notable topic. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:25, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. However interesting the article may be, it does not seem incredibly notable and does appear to be original research.  Possibly the article could be strengthened and resubmitted at a later time or something similar.  LogicalCreator (talk) 07:27, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Kobold-ly forth and merge a little bit to Kobold. Kobolds are the Rodney Dangerfield of fantasy gaming cannon fodder and don't merit a separate article. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is no sourced content to merge. -- Whpq (talk) 14:08, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Rename to Kobolds in popular culture as per WP:MOS for a section spun out of Kobold and remove unsourced content OR delete. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:13, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.