Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kod


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to KOD. SoWhy 11:22, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Kod

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Software program that lasted two years (2010-2012) with no substantial/enduring cultural impact. Significant coverage is lacking. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 15:55, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 04:31, 21 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep for now. Even though this article is already discontinued by its project-founder, I believe it gave enough impact during those two years. Also, future related text-editors could also take a look at past ones to maybe improve and gain ideas about the features they would plan to create. Perhaps, the article just need a good reorganisation and improvements. Romrom9 (talk) 08:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete if there isn't significant coverage in secondary sources that can be found. Is there anywhere it could be merged to Classicwiki? Alduin2000 (talk) 20:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Alduin2000. Possibly redirect to List of text editors? I don't know where to merge the content. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 23:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not a notable software product. The only independent reference is a 3-paragraph review in Lifehacker. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 05:26, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. I don't think there has been a good argument to keep this. I think it would be best to redirect to the disambiguation KOD or one of the pages listed on there rather than List of text editors because it isn't notable as a text editor. Alduin2000 (talk) 21:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.