Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kodak Photo Printer 6800


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:00, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Kodak Photo Printer 6800

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Stub article apparently based entirely on a press release. Notability (or lack of it)- no evidence that this specific printer is especially notable in its own right (we don't tend to have individual articles for other manufacturers' printers either).

Despite having been created over 15 years ago, the core article remains almost identical to the original stub- nothing of note has been added since then, and likely never will.

(There are quite a few subsequent edits, but virtually all are administrative, or minor changes like corrections or adding links).

Ubcule (talk) 14:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete not every model of printer is notable. We need something more than a press release on the product to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * A corporate press release predicting the future is both a biased and non-factual basis for an article. Surely, I thought, there is proper independent documentation talking about this subject in the past tense, as it has been 17 years since the projected release date.  After some research, it appears that there is not.  I couldn't find anything to even use for a good stub on this, let alone one with scope for expansion.  Book mentions turned out to be "printing process B is used in printers M, N, O, and P".  There's no indication of computer magazine articles, let alone in-depth ones.  And that seems to be true of any Kodak printer, excluding obvious recycled press releases.  This is non-notable as clearly shown by it not having been been noted in its lifetime or since.  Delete.  Uncle G (talk) 14:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable enough.Pancho507 (talk) 11:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.