Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kodenshi AUK Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted as G12 Wily D  07:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Kodenshi AUK Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The article is written in a non-neutral POV, like an advertisement. The creator and the main contributor of the article seem have a conflict of interest on the company. The references do not establish how the company is notable, per WP:N. The article was submitted at AfC before (Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kodenshi AUK) and its creation was declined. Wylve (talk) 20:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

KEEP: This page is not written like any advertisement, the references are solid and the article seems pretty neutral. Please indicate which parts do not seem neutral so that it may be corrected. Dstrausser83 (talk) 20:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

COMMENT: These articles are two totally different and totally differently formatted articles. I do believe that you have confused the articles or have not read them both. Can you please confirm what you are talking about specifically? The "denied" article is vastly different. They invented robotic opto sensors at a 50% cheaper cost than other companies, that's pretty big I'd say.Dstrausser83 (talk) 20:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * "They invented robotic opto sensors at a 50% cheaper cost than other companies" — you wanna speak English? That sounds like a bunch of buzzwords thrown together at random. Also, large portions of the text are copied wholesale from Kodenshi's homepage. You can not copy text from another page for the most part. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The references only provide trivial information. Please see WP:CORPDEPTH. Mere information on mergers, the resignation of a CEO, and annual announcements do not contribute to the notability of the company. --Wylve (talk) 05:29, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.