Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kodki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 02:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Kodki

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is written as a advert with no clear sources, it does not provide any relevant or useful information for this village — Preceding unsigned comment added by M3ash (talk • contribs) 2009/02/27 09:18:21
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Real villages are inherently notable, the horrible tone of the article is merely a cleanup issue. Edward321 (talk) 15:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Like Edward321 said, "Real villages are inherently notable".  Article I read may have been partly cleaned up; the tone did not seem extremely bad.  Still need to know what "gaams" are. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I did spend a few seconds cleaning up the article before you saw it. Edward321 (talk) 01:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verified as a village. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep all locations. We do not delete articles because they have bad content.  We delete them if the topic is not appropriate. — Reinyday, 04:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 'Keep all villages (but not necessarily all locations.) 7triton7 (talk) 06:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.