Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koffing and Weezing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of generation I Pokémon. ✗ plicit  12:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Koffing and Weezing

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Another Pokemon where the reception is just a few mentions in passing, plus game guides (which is all I see in BEFORE). Fails WP:GNG. At best redirect to List of generation I Pokémon. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  11:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  11:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  11:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  11:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect per nom. Link20XX (talk) 11:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of generation I Pokémon. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) We already have Koffing and Weezing redirects and there is no potential use for this combined search phrase, so while deletion is better than sending this to RfD later, the two character blurbs are unsourced in the Gen 1 list, so can merge to preserve some of the citations. czar  03:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of generation I Pokémon per nom. While I really like both these Pokémon (primarily because of my nostalgia for the anime). I do not see evidence of significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources. Aoba47 (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.