Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kohat Enclave


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pitam Pura.  MBisanz  talk 02:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Kohat Enclave

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable housing society. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - If the government of Delhi considered it notable and major enough to spend a fortune making the Kohat Enclave metro station on the Delhi Metro, then it's notable to us. --Oakshade (talk) 21:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:NOT applies considering it's only a local housing place, not an actual major subject, and we never keep articles because "one person or another considered it significant, therefore we must also accept it". SwisterTwister   talk  20:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * How would WP:NOT apply to a neighborhood even if it was "not an actual major subject"? We have hundreds of thousands of articles that are arguably minor but notable topics.   And it wasn't "one person or another considered it significant", but the entire Delhi Development Authority, Delhi Legislative Assembly, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation not to mention the Parliament of India which all funded and approved the Delhi Metro and where to place the station. --Oakshade (talk) 03:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't believe simply naming a metro station for a neighbourhood means it passes WP:GEOLAND. I'm guessing that if one could find Hindi reliable sources for this subdivision one could make a case that it passes WP:GNG and therefore GEOLAND for subdivisions, but that's just supposition on my part. Unless those sources are found, I'd say redirect to Pitam Pura, at least, for now. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.