Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kohlit

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. Stormie 08:22, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

Kohlit
Odd request for information, google provides no information on the topic--nixie 00:29, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete though I wish him good luck in finding the treasure buried under the big black X. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 00:37, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, un-encyclopaedic. Wikipedia is not a requests noticeboard. Megan1967 02:26, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * delete. google says: "The existence and location of this place is unknown." Unless someone wants to collect all what is "unknown" about this place and make an article. Mikkalai 03:01, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but mark as stub. Google shows hits including at research universities. -- Fred 03:18, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I've just sent a mail to the poster urging him to write a normal article from what he knows. Mikkalai 03:45, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * You'll probably not receive an answer from "Indy Jones" with the mailbox name "QumranScroll" who is asking for information about a lost city, mentioned in one of the dead sea scrolls from Qumran, where gold and silver are said to be buried. (Talk about there being clues all over the map!) Uncle G 12:45, 2005 Jan 25 (UTC)
 * Delete and Merge into Requested_articles/Social_Sciences_and_Philosophy . --RoySmith 16:02, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Uncle G's rewrite makes this worth keeping. I stubified it and change my vote to Keep, based on the current state of the article.  --RoySmith 13:42, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Rewritten Article. The article is no longer a request, and does mention what is known. Weak keep Uncle G 12:45, 2005 Jan 25 (UTC)
 * Keep as changed. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy)  01:44, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * keep Mozzerati 23:20, 2005 Jan 28 (UTC)
 * keep this is interesting and valuable to someone researching many subjects. --JPotter 08:54, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)