Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koibana Onsen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Koibana Onsen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD was deleted by IP, my original concern was "Appears to be an unremarkable manga, whose author doesn't even have an article. All I found are links to illegal scanlations." Yes No Bra is notable, but that doesn't extend to this manga. I might eventually read this because the main character has the same surname as a certain anime character, but I still don't believe this manga is notable, and the fact that all I found were illegal scanlation sites doesn't help at all. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:32, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: Why is the author not having an article an issue with this title, and not the other one? Shiroi Hane (talk) 19:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That is my reason for nomination is not becaust the mangakka does not have an article (many notable manga are like that), but because I was not able to find enough reliable sources to establish notability. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete There are tons of articles about low-profile manga which will most likely never be noteworthy. No anime production in sight nor English licensing. DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 02:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.