Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koji Oishi (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Userfied. to User:Sadoka74/Koji Oishi  → Call me  Hahc  21  05:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Koji Oishi
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has been deleted twice by AfD and was restored on the premise that a fight promotion had been promoted to top tier which it had not. Speedy deletion was attempted but that was declined because of restoration history.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 08:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Userfy It's clear Oishi currently still fails WP:NMMA. I know Sadoka74 has been working hard on this article, so it makes sense to me to put it in his userspace (if he wants it).  Otherwise it can be deleted.  Mdtemp (talk) 18:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * That would make sense to me also.Peter Rehse (talk) 18:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Userfy I have to agree with the previous comments because he still doesn't meet WP:NMMA. I'd rather userfy than delete, although that option is fine with me.  I put a notice on Sadoka74's talk page about this discussion and to see if he'd be interested in having the article moved to his userspace. Papaursa (talk) 17:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Sadoka74 has made no WP edits in the past 5 days, but since The Bushranger moved this article into mainspace from User:Sadoka74/Koji Oishi, I think moving it back looks like a good idea. Papaursa (talk) 20:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.