Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kok-Yangak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep (nomination withdrawn). howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 22:51, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Kok-Yangak
Appears to violate WP:NOR. Delete. I knew it was a real place, with even an existing link to it (Kurmanbek Bakiyev). I just didn't want to try to do a legitimate article. Keep Bikeable's rewrite (could be speedy keep). JamesMLane 02:05, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This articles doesn't make any sense, is it about a place, or a creature? xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  04:25, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as rewritten, looks like an OK stub now. xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  16:19, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- "I have researched" is always bad. Or just write an article about the city in Kyrgyzstan Kusma (討論) 04:32, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Bikeable's stub. Kusma (討論) 06:51, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Violates WP:NOR per the creator's admission. Durova 05:49, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:Bikeable and the rewrite. Durova 07:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious OR, as noted above. PJM 06:25, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep (rewritten). This is a real town, and as such is clearly notable.  I rewrote the article from the previous OR nonsense to a stub about the real place, about which little information is available to me.  I think that any town of that size definitely deserves an article.  Bikeable 06:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and kudos to Bikeable. -- JJay 07:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well done, Bikeable before I proceed to speedy keep. Capitalistroadster 16:57, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or speedy keep Bikeable's rewrite if everyone agrees. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 04:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.