Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kokkarakko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 16:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Kokkarakko

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A film that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.


 * The general notability guideline states: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." (FAILS)


 * The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.
 * The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following:
 * Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release.
 * The film was deemed notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals, when such a poll was conducted at least five years after the film's release.
 * The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release.
 * The film was featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.
 * The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
 * The film was selected for preservation in a national archive.
 * The film is "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.

FAILS on of the above too. Now about the references:
 * 1 - "Kokkarakko". www.malayalachalachithram.com. - not really a reference, but an entry in the Malayalan movie database. Besides of the question of reliability, it shows no notability.
 * 2 - "Kokkarakko". malayalasangeetham.info. - essentially as above, an entry in a database.
 * 3 - "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2 November 2014. - the same; an entry in a database.

None of the references are actually can be used to support any of the criteria above.


 * I think this article fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 08:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * What about WP:BEFORE ? Atlantic306 (talk) 01:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment to judge teh quality of work of the editor of this article please visit his talk page - User_talk:Niajm. Kolma8 (talk) 08:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Nasty comment, this is about the article not the creator Atlantic306 (talk) 01:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails NFILM and GNG; sources fail to establish notability Spiderone  14:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 16:25, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.