Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolachi (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Kolachi (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:CRYSTAL - unreleased film, no substantial coverage. In development for five years with apparently nothing but a YT trailer. MSJapan (talk) 16:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 17:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 17:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. There's very little out there to show that this movie is ultimately notable enough for an article. By all accounts it looks like it was planned and then dropped or indefinitely shelved. I'd normally suggest a redirect but this looks like it gained so little coverage that I don't think that it'd be worthwhile. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: It's just WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL I think. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 23:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per KGirlTrucker81. —Mythdon 10:27, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: While there are films that have seen prolonged development that have pages on Wikipedia, they at least have substantial coverage. I can't see anything here. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 09:27, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.