Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolinsky sable


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 04:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Kolinsky sable
Delete mass copyright problems San Saba 17:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Question: Is it a copyvio?Bjones 18:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * sorry, heres one of the pages that was copied http://www.paintersstudio.com/brushes/brushtypes.php San Saba 19:06, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Has only received one vote after being de-orphaned. - ulayiti (talk)  18:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, subject to change pending a rewrite.Bjones 19:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Copyright problems have a separate procedure.  And only the most recent version was a copyvio.  I've taken that part out.  NickelShoe 21:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep because - well, because, hell I didn't know that, and I've now discovered that the brush I bought today is apparently made of exactly that! Guy 23:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 19:46, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. and rewrite. as an artist, this a familiar and famous type of brush. psch  e  mp  |  talk  07:28, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Merits its own article. If it's a copyvio, stick a template on there to follow proper copyvio procedure. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk  19:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep; there was a copyvio from this 2002 webpage, but I've deleted it. The rest seems legit. Melchoir 22:31, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.