Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolkata neighbourhoods


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 09:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Kolkata neighbourhoods
Delete. The article reads: Kolkata city has many densely populated outskirts region. Period. That's a bit too short, and not really useful information. Robert Weemeyer 11:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * As it stands I think this is an A1 speedy delete. Tagged. --Malthusian (talk) 12:58, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, now a decent stub. I removed the speedy tag. I was aware of Dwaipayanc's good history, but as the article had been like that for a month and a half I thought perhaps it had been abandoned and forgotten. --Malthusian (talk) 09:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Wait before speedy deleting. Article created by, who has 1481 edits.  Maybe he's going to expand it.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-02-01 14:07Z 
 * Comment. Have left a message for Dwaipayanc. It might be too late as it has been nominated for speedy. In any case, it should be expanded so that it has some context. Capitalistroadster 00:54, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It has been expanded to stub status. Capitalistroadster 23:02, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, now that it's no longer empty. It needs some copy-editing though.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-02-03 12:15Z 
 * Delete. Category:Kolkata neighbourhoods already does all the job. The article contains little content, which can be added as description of the category. Besides, no other articles link to this page. utcursch | talk 08:52, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Johnleemk | Talk 15:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Categories don't serve the same purposes as articles.  User:Zoe|(talk) 18:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems like an encyclopedic article, and why do I always read these in my mind in an Apu Nahaseemapetilon accent? J I P  | Talk 18:47, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep articles, lists and categories all have different uses, as Zoe said. Jcuk 20:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand --Gurubrahma 18:07, 11 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.