Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolomna Bus Terminal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge to List of bus terminals in Moscow Oblast. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-18 08:22Z 

Kolomna Bus Terminal

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Substubs about 13 bus terminals in Moscow Oblast. All information in these articles is adequately conveyed by the List of bus terminals in Moscow Oblast, moreover, these terminals are not really notable. Delete or redirect to list. Conscious 10:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The nominator hasn't substantiated his/her claim about notability. It is also not true that all information in these articles is adequately conveyed by the List of bus terminals in Moscow Oblast, as the articles contain pictures, and I expect them to be expanded in the future so that it will not be appropriate to keep this information in a list. Colchicum 12:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, the pictures should be deleted, as they're replaceable fair use images. Conscious 13:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * We are not supposed to discuss this here. They haven't yet been deleted, and it is not up to us here to decide whether they should be deleted. It's another procedure. Colchicum 14:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Not sure. The information would be better if it were all kept in one article, but those photos are awfully nice, and should not be deleted for being in a stubby article. If the articles are deleted or merged, remember to put the template on TFD. YechielMan 19:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. Generally bus terminals, as opposed to bus stops, are long-term structures that have been built to house buses. --NE2 19:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge - most structures in Moscow have some kind of history behind them (and these terminals are not assembly-line reproductions of one another). I think the fair use ratioanle might apply to the List of bus terminals in Moscow Oblast article as the purpose is still to illustrate the subject in question and the images are used only once.  If the images can be transferred, then merge.  If the images cannot be merged, then keep the articles as expandable stubs.  If the fair use rationale will stand for including the images in List of bus terminals in Moscow Oblast, I will support a merge, redirect -- Black Falcon 21:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. To keep them separately, one should add some information and explain why each terminal is interesting and notable. Biophys 00:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per NE2's arguments differentiating bus terminals from bus stops. In the present condition the articles hardly merit separate pages, and the sourcing is non-existent (though I guess that the bus company's webpage of images will provide verification, so they do pass WP:V.) In any case, coverage of Moscow's transport system, including the bus terminals which are transportation hubs, is a valid endeavor. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I expect them to be expanded soon. We already have Moscow rail terminals, why not bus terminals? Look also at Ryazan Central Bus Terminal and Moscow Central Bus Terminal.--Dojarca 12:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Per NE2, these aren't just bus stops, but all are primary bus transit centers in cities.  --Oakshade 03:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * merge all until there is something to say beyond the name ; these articles dont even give the exact location in the city. DGG 04:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, but expand.&mdash;Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep notable, --Vsion 18:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.