Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolu (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Kolu (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, I found no sources meeting the standard of WP:CORPDEPTH. Rentier (talk) 22:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:30, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, possibly "speedy" -- an advertorially toned page on an unremarkable company / app. Sources are in passing and / or WP:SPIP; citations include: "Working at Kolu". Glassdoor" -- seriously? Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Coverage of this very young company seem to be quite local. According to Wikipedia standards it is "too soon" for an article because the company hasn't yet received substantial independent coverage. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, promo piece of a non-notable company. Kierzek (talk) 16:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and possibly should have been speedy deleted. Fails WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. Utterly promotional with no indications of notability.  HighKing++ 18:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.