Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kom Do Kwan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  06:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Kom Do Kwan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This appears to be a single school not very long established (maybe with a branch). Very few ghits. The references given seem to be about TKD in general than this school which I find a bit disingenious. I call WP:NN and advertisment.Peter Rehse 07:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletions.   —Peter Rehse 07:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per advert. Onnaghar tl 11:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete agreed this appears to be a single school system, thus not notable. IMHO, when martial arts systems exceed 100+ schools they start to become notable... this one is a long ways away from that goal.Balloonman 15:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:SPAM. Nen  yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 16:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete nn ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 20:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.