Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Komala ITC and Technical Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Flowerparty ☀ 00:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Komala ITC and Technical Institute

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Trade school with no notability established. Article created yesterday and contributors have been spamming about it in several other articles Corpx (talk) 17:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Questions Aren't trade or vocational schools considered secondary or tertiary level institutions? Don't we generally consider educational institutions at those levels notable? Drawn Some (talk) 17:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I dont think there's a set of guidelines for school notability (WP:SCHOOL is dead).  I dont believe in automatic notability for something that's lacking significant coverage by reliable sources.   Besides, in India, there is a trade school on every corner.  Corpx (talk) 17:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The problem is the failing of WP:V, as evidenced by the fact that to get the two sources the article creator has to invent a name only found on Wikipedia. As the nominator says, these for-profit schools as common as pushcarts in India. Abductive (talk) 17:47, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - article has no reliable sources. I looked for some using the full name given in the title as well as fragments of the name, and the only hits I got were the Wikipedia article and a single-digit number of pages that do not qualify as reliable sources. The institute does not even appear to have its own site. Sebwite (talk) 04:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I had the same question as Drawn Some on the notability of secondary and tertiary level institutions. While secondary level institutions have been accepted per general consensus, I'm not sure trade schools have been given the same consideration, especially given that these don't fit into general accreditation boards and/or the number of them. This particular one likely exists and their students are allowed to take accredited exams, but nothing really beyond that. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Spaceman7Spiff. Salih  ( talk ) 16:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.