Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Komikwerks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Woohookitty(cat scratches) 09:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Komikwerks

 * Delete NN publishing company; almost no text left after removing copyvio from komikwerks.com. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 20:04, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep The subjective designation of NN publishing company is incorrect. Komikwerks is one of the longest running web comics portals that also has a history of regular printed volumes. Further, it is home to "Stan Lee's Sunday Funnies", hosting the most significant name in the history of comics. Several of the comics properties have been optioned for film. The company is marshalling a major book launch for 2006. It was recently featured on the NBC prime time series "Las Vegas" (episode #56 - "Mothwoman" which aired November 21). The copyvio designation is also incorrect. The text was based on an article from author's (my) own website (Comics2Film.com article -- which, admittedly, is drawn from a press release) and I give Wikipedia full permission to reprint and use as a basis for the Komikwerks entry. Request that gutted article be restored and article be removed from the AfD list. Apologies in advance if this "keep" entry is formatted incorrectly. .:.Robworley.:.
 * Comment is the originator and sole contributor to Komikwerks --  Dalbury ( Talk )  14:30, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment This is true, but it doesn't look like he's part of Komikwerks itself. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 13:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment In the interest of full disclosure I will say that at the time I posted the article I had written a book for the 2006 launch and a short comics story for the upcoming anthology. –Robworley 04:13, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Alexa ranking of 1,729,487, doesn't meet WP:WEB. --  Dalbury ( Talk )  14:30, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Alexa rank is not _absolute_, specially on the sites that don't rank into the top 10k.Rvalles 03:35, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Robworley. Put the above info into the article and it will be quite good. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 06:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep As per Robworley. Given the source of the original article, it looks like we should allow the original text to return. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 13:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.