Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kong Lingxi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Kong Lingxi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested BLP-PROD. Article has existed since 2012 with the sole reference being an interview with the subject. A search for better references only turned up Wikipedia mirrors and several other people with the same name. No objection to an A7 speedy delete given the article as it currently stands, but maybe there are Chinese/Tibetan sources with which this can be improved? --Finngall talk 00:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk  00:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of coverage. CharlesWain (talk) 06:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Student-interviews-celebrity falls squarely under WP:NOTINHERITED, in the absence of any indication of subsequent notability on other grounds. Nor does the interview appear sufficiently distinguished in itself to merit recasting the article into something like "2008 interview with Dalai Lama". AllyD (talk) 08:34, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability (and no idea why this was included underlist of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions) Jeppiz (talk) 18:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I found a Radio Free Asia interview and a few Epoch Times articles, but Radio Free Asia is politically biased in this topic area and Epoch Times is straight-up disinformation, so yeah. Mucube (talk • contribs) 20:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn’t meet WP:GNG and a clear example of WP:NOTINHERITED. Shawn Teller (talk) 01:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.