Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kongcrete


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Kongcrete

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While the subject of the article may be considered notable at one point, the band and album have currently received, at most, trivial coverage. Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak delete Two factors: one, the article contains no real coverage of the actual topic or indication of why it's notable or how it satisfies WP:ALBUM; two, the sources given only mention the album en passant.  / /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 23:06, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability is not temporary. So if the band was notable, we keep the article. But most/all mentions on the web are self-promotion; the band was never notable. Fences and windows (talk) 03:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —-- Avant-garde a clue - hexa  Chord 2  16:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.