Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konstantina Pirkas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Konstantina Pirkas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability per WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NACTOR. I am unable to find significant discussion of her in multiple reliable sources. ... disco spinster   talk  15:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  15:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  15:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  15:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  15:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:52, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The article does not even point us to anything that would have been a significant role in a notable production, even one that we can critique and show was either not significant or not in a notable production. While academics of theatre/acting can be notable for such, we would have to have substantial publications, or being the head of a university, or being editor-in-chief of an academic journal related to acting/theatre that is considered a significant publication, none of which we are even close to seeing indicated. This is the largest failure of actress notability I have ever seen for an actress, and one of the most extreme failures of academic notability I have ever seen for an academic. Of course if we applied a rule like the football notability rule to academics, the academic equivalent might be met here, but that is not at all our rule, so clearly no notability guidelines are met.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.