Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kool-Aid Kush & Convertibles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. listed for 21 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough comments to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Kool-Aid Kush & Convertibles
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Declined an A9 speedy on this article as the subject's article exists. Per WP:NALBUMS, mixtapes are generally not notable, and I'm unable to find any reliable, third-party sources providing significant coverage of this subject. Tim Song (talk) 22:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:32, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note - it's also the name of a track, which might account to the rather similar google hits. Shadowjams (talk) 08:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep   all accepted sources on wikipedia.
 * That wording in nalbums needs to be de-emphasized: every official Lil Wayne mixtape is notable; every Clipse tape, every Chamillionaire tape, every Gucci Mane tape (and there are so many) probably passes GNG; we have notable artists who have never released a retail album (Freddie Gibbs, Max B, Jay Electronica etc.); outlets such as hiphopdx, mtv.com and XXL have set up columns devoted to covering notable mixtapes at this stage. 86.44.25.11 (talk) 16:35, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note I wrote it up a bit with these above and a few other refs. 86.44.20.147 (talk) 16:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  01:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.