Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kooley High


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:13, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Kooley High

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

It is an extremely obscure hip hop group, that does not fit Wikipedia's requirements according to WP:Notability. There are no well-known or liable sources. Looking at the edit history, all edits seem to be from the band themselves. The article is completely biased, and it has absolutely no negative criticism. The article is also arranged extremely poorly. Marqueesigns (talk) 21:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - the arrangement of the article and lack of criticism are no reasons for a deletion but wholesale lack of any reliable sources certainly is.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:15, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 02:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 02:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The sources given--youtube, myspace and vimeo, etc--are not WP:RS and don't establish this group's WP:N. --Artene50 (talk) 02:33, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.