Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koprol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 04:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Koprol

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable local  social  networking  site. Promotional tone. Does not appear to  be onnected with  Yahoo as may  seem  to  be suggested on  its site graphics. Kudpung (talk) 06:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  —Kudpung (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, needs editing, but id.yahoo.com does appear to link to this as "Korpol [Baru]" (I presume that means "Beta") News sources seem to confirm that Yahoo acquired them, and there are recent results on a gnews search for them. (They aren't in English so I have no idea what they say.) OSbornarfcontributionatoration 21:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Reading this thing more, it's like it was auto translated or something. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 22:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Executed some heavy cleanup. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 22:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep sufficient coverage in WP:RS to pass WP:N (e.g. the Tempo articles I just added). As for the nominator's statement that it "Does not appear to  be onnected with  Yahoo", I can only assume he did not follow WP:BEFORE whatsoever: the very first item in Google News Archive is about its acquisition by Yahoo. cab (call) 05:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.