Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kordell Samuel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 04:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Kordell Samuel

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that the Malaysian 2nd division is fully pro, a claim not supported by reliable sources at WP:FPL or elsewhere. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:08, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:08, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - if by any chance the article gets kept, it will need to be 100% re-written, it's probably the least encyclopedically-written football article I've come across -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete – no evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. 09:35, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 14:04, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete does not appear to meet GNG. The usportt.com might be acceptable (although I don't know how reliable it is), but article would need additional independent sources anyway. Eldumpo (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - article is about a footballer who has not played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, which means that the article fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 08:51, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.