Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korea Surfing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Korea Surfing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Calls for WP:TNT. Yes we need an article about surfing in Korea but this needs too much work. Lots of unsubstantiated information "every surfer in Busan knows about it" as well as bio's of individual surfers. Blow it up and start again Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm not usually a TNT person, but this is quite the case for it. Not even the right article name for English syntax.--Jahaza (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as WP:G1. This is an absolute gibberish page, which even if written in proper english, would not be a useful page for the project. Seems like clear vandalism. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:20, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak delete: The subject is, objectively and independently, worthy of an encyclopedia article, but, not being a native (or even non-native) speaker of Korean, I can't tell whether this is just incredibly (almost hilariously) badly translated or a deliberate goof. If it is for real, and a person out there in en.wikipedia-land was able to make it less, um, like this, it would barely cross the line into "weak keep." I'm not holding my breath, though.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  23:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as barely comprehensible despite the loads of information, this needs to be restarted with better information and sources. SwisterTwister   talk  20:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.