Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korea ginseng corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  22:50, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Korea ginseng corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only a single reference and notability appears to rest on the fact that Harrods stocks its products. Reads like an advertisment. No evidence of independent notability.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The claim of notability is clearly stated in the opening paragraph of the article, and has no connection with Harrods. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 18:01, 31 May 2013 (UTC)




 * Keep - Major supplier of ginseng and covered in reliable sources. I suspect there is a lot of sources in Korean, but I stuck to English and found articles in the Korean Times, Joongang Daily, and Chosun Ilbo. -- Whpq (talk) 14:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Suffers from 'business article' faults, but is a notable company which meets GNG, Korean sources are assumed to exist and Whpq has pointed out some possible additions. The articles faults can be fixed, but its best to keep it under the circumstances. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:24, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.