Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korean-Shinto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 09:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Korean-Shinto

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced and possible original research on an obscure religious group with no assertion of notability (article explicitly states that there are probably less than 100 followers.) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could not find any reliable sources for the religion, probably not notable. Malinaccier (talk) 03:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Possibly a hoax and fails notability guidelines. At best it should be merged with Shinto.  GraYoshi2x► talk 20:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete BS by the cartload, can't believe it survived two and a half years. There really was forced Shinto practise (State Shinto) in Korea during the latter part of the Japanese colonial era, which may be an encyclopedic topic, but that article would have to be written from scratch, as this piece of junk has nothing factual to add to that topic. cab (talk) 00:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  cab (talk) 00:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unless reliable sources can be found. I couldn't find anything after a brief search. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  —Fg2 (talk) 10:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sure how I missed the nature of the article when I was disambiguating... but then, it was a few years back. Dekimasu よ! 14:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.