Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koron (music)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Courcelles 00:25, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Koron (music)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No references and improper editing. —AssassiN's Creed (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Now tidied and referenced using the wonders of a Google query. "Improper editing" can be fixed: see WP:BEFORE #10. AllyD (talk) 20:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC) I also note that this article was brought to AfD a mere 7 minutes after it was created. AllyD (talk) 21:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Aside from the reference I added to the article, Google Books turns up snippet views in "Encyclopædia Iranica", in an "Iran almanac and book of facts", and in "Der Islam im Spiegel zeigenössischer Literatur der islamischen Welt" and possibly the New Grove (which has no preview). So well-attested. The remaining question, though, is whether it can sustain an article in itself, or is more appropriate merged into another article on Iranian music? This is where proper time for consideration by experts in the field - the normal maturing of a new article - is worthwhile. AllyD (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: the editing is not proper but the source is reliable. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 05:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.