Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korrekt (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Korrekt (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. He hasn't been discussed in multiple reliable sources. The Leadership Newspaper source is the only promising source I could find. The subject simply hasn't done enough to warrant a stand-alone inclusion.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 21:57, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 21:58, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 21:58, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 21:58, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Delete - non-notable musician who fails GNG. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment you are right when you say the article fails WP:GNG but his a notable musician. The subject has being discussed in several newspaper sites and magazines which have not being included. WP:GNG discussed about reliable source editors can help by improving the article. Jamzy4 (talk) 22:35, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Comment: I just made a research on Google and found out that the subject has independent source also have been discuss in several newspaper and magazine, issue will be fixed.Jamzy4 (talk) 23:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Keep:- Subject of article has being improve with multiple reliable source like newspaper according to WP:GNG. Editors are free to contribute to the article when discussion is closed. Please note that Wikipedia policy are right and can not change. According to WP:MUSICBIO, it says '' musician may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria:. Subject meets WP:MUSICBIO 1,2, 4,6, 7,8, 10. Jamzy4 (talk) 12:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Current sourcing in mostly reproductions of press releases, as is the one the nominator suggests may be good. Same press release is all over the place . duffbeerforme (talk) 11:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per others. Lacks significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Sole keep vote comes from the article creator, a single-purpose account with apparent undeclared conflict of interest, considering the claim to self-authorship for the professional-quality image he/she uploaded of this artist. Citobun (talk) 10:09, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Actually i suggest this a wrong tag for this article instead a tag should be place on the article saying contributors can help by adding reliable source, According to my understanding on wikipedia is says "Remember all good articles today started with a bad issues".--Jamzy4 (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.