Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kortney Kane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Kortney Kane

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, only nominations. No independent, reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:57, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins and being a Penthouse Pet of the Month is not enough. Fails GNG without substantial coverage by reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * delete blps must be sourced. Spartaz Humbug! 22:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as not received any awards that would make her notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:00, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - contrary to what Gene contends, also being a Penthouse Pet has been enough to keep many other other articles because its a mainstream publication. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Playboy Playmates and Penthouse Pets are not automatically notable. Those criteria were removed from PORNBIO years ago. Non-notable Playmates and Pets do get deleted here. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree, that status by itself does not, but when you start combining things, it bears a closer review. There are thousands of porn actors, hundreds of Playmates and Pets, a select few that are both. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 16:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you want your views to be accorded any credibility you need to start putting forward arguments that have a basis on what wikipedia considers a reason to include a subject and not some nonsense just plucked out of thin air. Don't like the policies? Then go work on something where you and the rest of the community can agree on. Spartaz Humbug! 18:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Concur with nominator and Gene93k. Finnegas (talk) 11:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.