Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korugar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect to wherever is deemed most appropriate can be created editorially.  Sandstein  08:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Korugar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

How many of these things are there?!! LaundryPizza03 (talk) 07:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:59, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:59, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

comment I am not ready to !vote on this one, but the BEFORE seems less convincing than for other articles flagged by this nom. Korugar seems to be discussed in numerous independent sources, mostly books, and in-universe style is grounds for SOFIXIT, not for deletion. I suggest that others look into the matter before !voting. Newimpartial (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with Newimpartial. I think adding to the article; and making it clear that this is a page about how Korguar has been invented, published on, and discussed, would be a better way to problems with the article. Ryan shell (talk) 19:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Redirect to Sinestro. Pretty much all real-world notability for the planet comes from this character. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:39, 24 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Zap with a delete ray It is unclear whether this article should redirect to Sinestro, Sinestro Corps, or his successors. Therefore it is better off simply deleted for being non-notable comicbook fancruft.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:39, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:21, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Newimpartial.Ryan shell (talk) 16:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The question is if it is notable enough. Something like "Gotham City" is definitely notable due to huge coverage...but this seems to be only mentioned in a few comic books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Expertwikiguy (talk • contribs) 18:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.