Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koshish Karne Walon Ki Kabhi Har Nahi Hoti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Harivansh Rai Bachchan. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 02:06, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Koshish Karne Walon Ki Kabhi Har Nahi Hoti

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The claim of notability ('an inspirational piece of poetry', etc.) is dubious, and unsupported since there are no sources. Plus, WP:PEACOCK but that is not a reason to delete. Tigraan (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Harivansh Rai Bachchan, which does at least mention this work briefly. I see no evidence that this poem (or most of his other individual works) is separately notable. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Harivansh Rai Bachchan -per ATD-R. It is a famous poem by H. R. Bachchan -. I've heard a lot of this poem, but unable to determine its notability for a standalone article. Since it is a Hindi poem, sources are primarily supposed to exist in Hindi language (very recently few Hindi newspapers have started to archive their publications and even they are a tough job to find on search engines). Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  20:51, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect, as per the previous comments - I should have taken the time to search the author's name before nominating. Anyways, notable enough or not for a standalone article, this would need a major rewrite.Tigraan (talk) 10:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * - I've struck your vote as you've already voted above, You are allowed to change your rational above and doing it that way means it doesn't confuse everyone :), Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 02:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.