Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovan–Peruvian relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete, any content has already been merged with the information at International recognition of Kosovo.  Jamie ☆ S93  17:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Kosovan–Peruvian relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no evidence of an ongoing relationship in reliable sources that would make this a notable bilateral relationship that wikipedia should have an article on. Bali ultimate (talk) 18:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This article is a stub and will be improved in the near future. We can improve it and save it from deletion.-- Turkish Flame   ☎  18:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Using what sources? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You've got a week. Good luck. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  17:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Improved with WHAT, Turkish Flame? Delete as non-notable, significant in-depth coverage of the relationship between Kosovo and Peru simply doesn't exist.  That Peru recognizes Kosovo as a state can be included in Foreign relations of Kosovo International recognition of Kosovo per HJMitchell if it's not already there. Drawn Some (talk) 18:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to International recognition of Kosovo then delete. I'm sorry, but all there is to the article is "Peru recognised the independence of Kosovo". That's good. When you read around and realise that over 60 governments have done the same thing... For the record, I'd have no opposition to re-creation if or when a relationship develops. HJMitchell    You rang?  21:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge per HJMitchell; in looking at the map in that article, it looked impressive, but Peru is joining a crowd. Mandsford (talk) 00:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Foreign relations of Peru, but keep the redirect. Aymatth2 (talk) 03:00, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The information that "Peru recognized Kosovo" is already contained in both the Foreign relations of peru article and at the International recognition of Kosovo article. So the "merge" has already happened (that's the entire content of this article) so let's delete this.Bali ultimate (talk) 19:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I prefer to redirect for the convenience of the readers. Redirects cost nothing. The merge/redirect for this title should be to "Foreign relations of Kosovo", and another redirect/merge for Peru–Kosovo relations should be to "Foreign relations of Peru" to avoid any NVOP issues. The same material is repeated in both articles. Fork? Aymatth2 (talk) 01:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:N isn't met Nick-D (talk) 08:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no independent coverage of the topic, only trivia, ergo, fails WP:N. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  17:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, I agree with being so short. But it doesn't mean it can't be improved. --♪♫ Berkay 0652 10:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to note some canvassing going on by turkish flame (yes the "message" is neutral, the audience all have voted keep on these sorts of afd's in the past).   .Bali ultimate (talk) 12:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete really doubt Kosovo has any notable relations with a developing country thousands of kilometres away. doubt that Peru as a developing country has sent any resources to assist Kosovo. doubt that the leaders have even met let alone had a phone discussion. LibStar (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I think this article should stay and contribute, and I am completely against deletion.--Liridon 18:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:ILIKEIT is not a valid reason. LibStar (talk) 23:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep --Sintonak.X (talk) 22:35, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:JUSTAVOTE is not valid. LibStar (talk) 23:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete or Merge to International recognition of Kosovo and/or Foreign relations of Peru--anything but keeping this as a stand alone article. There is insufficient coverage of this topic in reliable, third-party sources to justify an article on it. In other words, it fails WP:N. Yilloslime T C  22:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * DeleteI suspect the author creates these articles for a laugh, they surely can't be serious.Knobbly (talk) 13:10, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and per precedent decision to merge these articles into International recognition of Kosovo.--Avala (talk) 17:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of meaningful content here as noted above. Eusebeus (talk) 12:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.