Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovo–Nauru relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 12:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Kosovo–Nauru relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy was removed so bringing here. Whilst there are articles for bilateral relations, some of which are underdeveloped, we as a project have to look at whether there is a realistic opportunity for development of an article past the fact that two countries recognise each other. There are no political, military, trade, transport or cultural tie between Kosovo and Nauru on which to build an encyclopaedic article.The fact that these two countries recognise each other is noted at International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence and until such time as true bilateral relations emerge, this article, unfortunately, is not notable, with an a distinct possibility that it can't be built into an encyclopaedic entry. (There are other articles in this Kosovo series, such as Burkina Faso, Samoa, etc which could be looked at as well) Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 20:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Most of the "Nauru-.... relations" articles are short like "Nauru-Kosovo relations". Ex: Nauru–Russia relations, Nauru-United Kingdom relations. If we delete all, Nauru won't have any relations articles... -- Turkish Flame   ☎  21:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC


 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 00:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I think it should be kept so that when the 'encyclopaedic' information comes to light it can be added . 安東尼   TALKies  10:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Is the fact of recognition of nationhood status notable in itself? If not, then the article adds nothing to our knowledge about either nation. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I remember someone was using AWB or some other script a couple of months back to create X-Y relations for pretty much every country pair, despite that many of the intersections were decidedly trivial. This one looks like it slipped through. Stifle (talk) 08:35, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Check Special:Contributions/Turkish_Flame. This user created articles for every possible combination. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as there seems to have been no actual relations to speak of besides the brief statement of recognition quoted in the article. Some of the others created by the same author (example: Senegal–Turkey relations are even worse. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Bloody far fetched. Annette46 (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Trivial. Ron B. Thomson (talk) 20:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Feel free to also nominate this, this, this, etc. in a later nom. Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  22:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Most of the bilateral relations articles are stubs like this article. I'm not the only editor who creates short bilateral relations articles. For example: User:Groubani --- Greek-Kenyan relations -- Turkish Flame   ☎  11:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Then this has to be deleted as well. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete An encyclopaedia does not need to have an article on every country pair on the planet discussing their tenuous relations. Mvjs   Talking  04:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no "relations" between Nauru and Kosovo and Metohija. What happened is the U.S. government demanded that Nauru recognize Kosovo and Metohija. --Tocino 17:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nauru recognises Kosovo (something noted elsewhere). As nothing else exists to indicate the notability of this fact, we need not have an article on the matter. Biruitorul Talk 23:03, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.