Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotha Remalle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Remalle. (non-admin closure) Ben · Salvidrim!   &#9993;  08:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Kotha Remalle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is explicitly a WP:TNT nomination. It's unsourced and has been for a year, but the article is not even completely in English anymore as of recently. I looked for sources, but I couldn't find any which were reliable.

Deletion is not cleanup, but I'll invoke WP:IAR here because I think the situation is beyond saving at this point. Too much original research. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 04:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 04:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 04:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep A verified settlement per WP:GEOLAND. The article is not beyond saving. Indeed SportingFlyer has already saved it by making a simple revert.Pontificalibus 09:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge Spent a few minutes researching this. I reverted the article back to its last good revision and added the AfD template back in place, but there's also an Remalle article which needs to be improved which clearly passes WP:GEOLAND #1. OpenStreetMap has a "Kotta Remalle" and a "Pata Remalle" which if the Remalle article is to be believed stands for "old" and "new" in the local language Telugu (thanks Google Translate.) So we should just fold this into the actual article we have for the settlement as part of the WP:TNT. SportingFlyer  T · C  09:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Remalle. The article is now a perfectly reasonable village stub so WP:TNT doesn’t appear to apply anymore, if it ever did. SportingFlyer’s argument for a merge over a keep is convincing so I’d go for that. Hugsyrup 07:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm fine with with a merge as to enable a WP:Speedy keep. Regards, &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 15:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Wikipedia is a gazeteer, so we keep all articles on actual distinct places.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:57, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.