Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kouichi Belgira


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Kouichi Belgira

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 04:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 04:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 04:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Has not played in a Tier-1 match or in a WP:FPL; lack of significant independent coverage; fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 04:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet the notability guidelines for football players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. — Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 05:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 17:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.