Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koyakatsi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Koyakatsi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NF: films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines. Similarly, films produced in the past, which were either not completed or not distributed, should not have their own articles unless their failure was notable per the guidelines. Slashme (talk) 14:15, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete without prejudice toward undeletion/recreation when film finally meets WP:NF or gains enough coverage to merit being an exception to WP:NFF. After removal from article space, redirect title to the article on filmmaker Ayoub Qanir where, per POLICY and available sources, this film can certianly be written of as a completed work and upcoming release.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello, I would like to keep the page "Koyakatsi" -- I have included both in the page and below a number of publications that demonstrate the film is indeed notable and has sparked a great deal of interest from the audience both in the film, music and scientific community.
 * I have included prestigious news and trade publications such as Huffington Post, iTunes, Amazon, IMDB, Space Collective, and Behance Network. I find that the fact that the following publications find the film notable demonstrate a genuine interest both from the audience and the industry alike.
 * Please find the links below.
 * Thank you so much for your time and guidance, they're greatly appreciated.
 * http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jason-silva/koyakatsi-film_b_1965107.html
 * http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2225720/
 * http://pro.imdb.com/title/tt2225720/
 * http://www.imdb.com/media/rm971288064/tt2225720
 * http://roboticsnews.co.uk/permalink/5338.html
 * http://spacecollective.org/AyoubQanir/7993/Koyakatsi-Enter-The-Civilization-of-Light
 * http://smashingpicture.com/koyakatsi-concept-art-previews-mind-bending-action-film/
 * http://www.amazon.com/Koyakatsi-Main-Theme-Motion-Picture/dp/B009P10S5M
 * https://itunes.apple.com/gb/artist/kodi-najm/id569503458
 * https://www.facebook.com/Koyakatsimovie/timeline
 * http://www.amazon.it/Koyakatsi-Main-Theme-Motion-Picture/dp/B009P3BL3I
 * http://www.amazon.fr/Koyakatsi-Main-Theme-Motion-Picture/dp/B009P3D7Y4
 * http://www.emusic.com/listen/#/album/kodi-najm/koyakatsi-main-theme-from-the-motion-picture/13646974/
 * http://soundcloud.com/koyakatsi/logical-means-of-destruction-1
 * https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.340109532730186.76683.154699474604527&type=3
 * http://www.behance.net/gallery/KOYAKATSI/4523717
 * http://www.dreampushers.com/koyakatsi-concept-art.html
 * http://www.debutart.com/illustration/kilian-eng/koyakatsi-movie-scene-a-2#/illustration-portfolio
 * http://blog.smartpress.com/daily-inspiration-549-koyakatsi-concept-art
 * http://twitter.com/Hypernova/statuses/223831378163273728
 * http://pinterest.com/pin/75857574944531934/
 * http://smashingpicture.com/koyakatsi-concept-art-previews-mind-bending-action-film/koyakatsi-concept-art03/
 * http://www.newsawy.com/goto.php?id=1954030016
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlelilia (talk • contribs) 23:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I understand your wish that your article not be deleted, and appreciate your offering of links... but I'd like you to take a look at WP:Identifying reliable sources to see how wikipedia determines just what makes a source reliable enough to be considered for determining a film's notability. While most of the links you provide show the film's existance (not in doubt), what is required is that the film topic has been the recipient of coverage (not just listings) in multiple reliable sources. Of the bunch above, we do not use Facebook or IMDB or Amazon.com or Apple.com to show notability. Huffington Post is suitable. Robotics News is a reprint of the title and is a link back to the Huffington article. Space Collective is a series of forum posts (not RS). So is Smashing Picture Behance.net Dreampushers and most of the others. Generally, blogs, forums, self-published websites, social networks, and sales sites do nothing to establish notability. Please take a look at WP:PRIMER to get a heads-up on how to build and source an article, take a look at WP:Too soon with attention paid to its section WP:NOT YET (films), and then go over to WP:Notability (films) to better understand wikipedia's requirements for films. The film may become notable if/when it gets more actual commentary and analysis in relibale sources... but at the moment it is premature. If you'd like the article returned to you for continued work, simply ask and it will be returned to you.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:58, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete/Userfy per lacking of notability. At best, it's too soon. Cavarrone (talk) 07:26, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 04:25, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  02:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)




 * Comment Like Schmidt, I also appreciate the offerings of links. But unfortunately most of those links are of Facebook, Twitter, Myspeace etc. Can you provide two notable newspaper references where the film has been covered as primary topic. Only two and it'll be okay if those are not in English (the newspaper needs to be internationally notable then). If you can, I'll change my vote to "Keep". Please ping at my talk page if I somehow miss it. Thank you!--Tito Dutta (talk) 21:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.