Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koyambedu junction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Certainly no consensus for deletion; possibly an editorial merger solution can be found.  Sandstein  23:29, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Koyambedu junction

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Road junctions are not the type of thing we cover in Wikipedia. Google news search doesn't reveal much and. already covered in Koyambedu. Michellecrisp (talk) 06:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - In actuality, road junctions are the type of thing we cover in Wikipedia (I dare the nom to AfD Four Level Interchange). The Hindu piece on this junction is in-depth and substantial. --Oakshade (talk) 06:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - in addition to what Oakshade said, I believe that any public place that has been given a name and can be found in a street directory is inherently notable. - Richard Cavell (talk) 11:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: The said place is more of prominent location in Chennai than a junction. A clear notable place. A plain Google search results itself gives 96,800 results. The article needs only to be expanded, cleaned and wikified --  Tinu  Cherian  - 12:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * A better article already exists. Redirect to Koyambedu --  Tinu  Cherian  - 13:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Koyambedu. We need to be wary of having too many articles on road junctions.  They would need to be exceptionally notable to qualify for includion in WP.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.