Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koyuki/Princess Snow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 10:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Koyuki/Princess Snow
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable minor anime character. Drawn Some (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to MÄR, the main article as below. JJL (talk) 00:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —Calathan (talk) 16:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete A more detailed article on the character already exists at Snow (MÄR), which is currently proposed for merger into List of MÄR characters. This article is redundant and should be deleted.  I don't think the name of this article as worded is a likely enough search term to be kept as a redirect, but if it is kept as a redirect, it should probably be redirected to Snow (MÄR) until that article is merged into the list of characters.  Also, the character is a major character in the series in question, not a minor character, but probably not notable enough for a stand-alone article. Calathan (talk) 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Clarifying my previous comment, Koyuki is a minor character but Princess Snow is a major character in the series. It is Princess Snow that the separate more detailed article is about. Calathan (talk) 17:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment sounds like a good way to handle matters to me. JJL (talk) 17:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 21:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, lack of references suggests it is unlikely to meet WP:V/WP:N. Stifle (talk) 08:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. We can't have an article for every fictional character. Some, maybe, but I'm seeing nothing to suggest that this one is at all notable. HJMitchell    You rang?  10:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.