Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kozí Vrbovok


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (I'm closing as Nom's withdrawn as with the greatest of respect He seems clueless to AFDs) / Per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Kozí Vrbovok

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hasn't been sourced for 8 1/2 years! Eeek! Lightspeed2012 19:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Well, why didn't you source it yourself then? ♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Obvious keep. "Unreferenced" is not grounds for deletion, let alone "Eek". Wikipedia verifiability policy is "all quotations and anything challenged or likely to be challenged be attributed in the form of an inline citation that directly supports the material". A glance at a map is enough to show that this is a genuine town, so no sane person is going to challenge that, and there is no contentious statement of any kind on this page of the kind that would bring WP:BLP into play. Mogism (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - WP:BEFORE wasn't followed at all (There's tons of books on this area but I can't speak Slovakian so not sure how relevant they actually are), Being unreferenced is not a valid reason to delete, It needs some work doing but IMHO deleting is pointless. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:48, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep for reasons indicated above. I think the article should be improved, but deleted is misguided. Why are we wasting our time on this?  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 20:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Deleting this article would be a waste when it wouldn't be too much trouble in sourcing it. ☯ Jag  uar  ☯ 20:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Looks like I made a mistake :/ . You're the one who created the article.  I should of read WP:BEFORE.  You do have a point. Thanks, I've gained knowledge from this mistake and I will apply it in the future.  :)  Lightspeed2012  21:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * When I created the article I'd only been here three months, in fact it was a lot longer before I actually learned how to reference!♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Understood. Myself I don't know most of Wikipedia's policies. But you've been doing major contributions to Wikipedia! I hope we are on good terms now. :) Lightspeed2012  21:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.