Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kozaz records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Kozaz records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. No WP:SECONDARY sources have discussed this record company. Binksternet (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and that's not surprising because it's unlikely this would've gotten the considerable sourcing which was needed for a better solid article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * keep the article because all sources are real and you should search about it in Persian language to find more sources. As a PR for the company I am going to write the article in Russian and Persian languages during this month.  14:36, 14 Janaury 2016(UTC)
 * As public relations agent for the company, you have a conflict of interest. That is, you want to help the company prosper more than you want to help Wikipedia be relevant. Please read WP:COI for the guideline on the limited manner in which you may participate here. Binksternet (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

*keep the article ] I help to Wikipedia as well because most of article are not exist about Russian and Persian or only are in Persian or Russian Language or even though only in English. 12:06, 19 Janaury 2016(UTC)
 * While you're welcome to add additional comments, you are only allowed to !vote once. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  02:39, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  06:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The recording label lacks the adequate notability both in English and Persian. Apart from the above mentioned conflict of interests of the comments from company's PR, its vocalist's page is subject to deletion as well. Arashtitan  15:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, because there may be sources in Persian (which I cannot read) that discuss the topic, but if they're not presented and we can't find them, they might as well not exist. Would be willing to change my position if a Persian-speaker can come up with something and vouch for their reliability.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.