Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krähenberg, Bremen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔   02:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Krähenberg, Bremen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

an officially unrecognized section of a city at best, made up at worst. The German WP has nothing on this area in its featured article on de:Bremen, and I cannot find anything official on this place, which may be an informal usage without any recognition. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. I wondered about this one. The same editor added it to the German DAB page with this edit. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:28, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: The "Krähenberg" in Bremen is apparently a small artificial dwelling hill from the Middle Ages (see http://stadtwerderwald.de/includes/media/beispielseiten-kalender.pdf). The immediate built-up area next to it seems to be called "Am Krähenberg", apparently registered (with name) under nr. 445_280 in the land usage registry of "Ortsteil" Oslebshausen, Bremen (see http://www.fnp-bremen.de/assets/website/fnpdata/pdfs/445_280.pdf). If kept, it should either 1. be renamed to "Am Krähenberg" or 2. rewritten to only mention the ancient hill. - Takeaway (talk) 16:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.