Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krabi International School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As several editors point out, the article has zero reliable sources at the moment and thus fails WP:GNG, which supercedes the precendent of school outcomes cited by the editors arguing to keep. Even if that weren't the case, the school is not currently a secondary school and it's crystal balling to assume it will be based on primary sources. No prejudice against recreation if better sources can be found.  A  Train ''talk 17:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Krabi International School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A recently (last year) opened school which hasn't been covered in the press at all. Does not appear to meet the WP:General notability guideline. Paul_012 (talk) 23:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep minimal article and cites needed but degree issuing schools are usually kept as per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Atlantic306 (talk) 23:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Arguing that something is usually kept per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES pretty much amounts to other stuff exists. The GNG is an official guideline, while SCHOOLOUTCOMES is not. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, the school has only begun operating at the primary is not yet fully operating at the secondary level, so it actually fails WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. See . --Paul_012 (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Not sure if it is relevant, but a bit of background is here and here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes, in this case in fact OTHER STUFF DOES EXIST, about ten thousand high school articles kept evidencing the  precedent  as documented  by  SCHOOLOUTCOMES. All our  guidelines are flexible and this is one of the most common  and widely accepted exceptions to them. See intro box at  WP:N. (Oh, and what an amazing coincidence, I just few back to Udon from Krabi 2 days ago) . Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding consensus and precedent. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Please see the above. The school has not fully opened as a secondary school. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The school is a high school catering for pupils up to age 18. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Not at least until next year, that is, according to their website. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:47, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Completely irrelevant, since it clearly will. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:50, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as it very clearly doesn't satisfy WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.
 * It clearly has only primary school students and no secondary school students as of now. Saying that one day it will become a secondary school is WP:CRYSTALBALL.
 * I am unable to find any resource to verify that the school is accredited. Note that the school website doesn't count for verifiability purposes. I wasn't able to access the website of the Thailand MOE. I found this International Schools Association of Thailand website (not sure how reliable) but the school is not listed here either.
 * I might be willing to change my !vote if more information comes to light which satisfies SCHOOLOUTCOMES. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Does appear to be recruiting secondary pupils. The Cambridge International Examinations website does list it if you search on Thailand and Krabi. I really don't think WP:CRYSTALBALL applies here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as doesn't satisfy WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, as noted, in its current state and is not a stub which conveys any detail of notability; further it has no WP:RS cites. Kierzek (talk) 15:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there is no verification in the article that this is an accredited school. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The Cambridge International Examinations website does list it if you search on Thailand and Krabi. It is indeed accredited by them. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.