Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraig Noel-McLeod


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Kraig Noel-McLeod

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. All sources are trivial and/or stats/databases Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 09:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep page clearly passes GNG based on references already on page.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Definitly notable. Entry in databses are signs of notability for sportspeople, especially if a player on a national team. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * No it isn't Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per and . He is an internationally capped player with an ongoing career with some sources already. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly fails WP:GNG - none of the sources mentioned in the article or the discussion are covering the subject in detail, they are mostly passing mentions and statistical reports. The fact he was internationally capped does not bring notability to the subject. --Angelo (talk) 11:29, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, there does not exist the coverage to pass GNG in this article, nor was their any better coverage from a search. All I could find were passing mentions and database listings, no significant coverage. Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:SPORTCRIT #5 which says Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. This explicitly states that database sources are not evidence of notability. There is not one reliable source providing detailed coverage. Passing mentions like Basingstoke Gazette are the best thing that this guy gets. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.