Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraklewo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Karpno, Bytów County. Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Kraklewo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A bot-created article by Kotbot, a bot run by retired user Kotniski. The location in the article is empty forest.

The only source in the article is a link to the Teryt database (the Polish equivalent of GNIS), using the SIMC code from the Polish version of the article I find a listing that says, in machine translation, that Kraklewo/Klaklewo is a part of the village of Karpno, something I also confirmed from the Polish regulation list place-names (część wsi Karpno). We already have an article about Karpno, Bytów County. Kraklewo appears to be a non-descript location and not obviously inhabited. The article is incorrect in saying it is a settlement - that would be an osada under Polish law, but it is not classified as that. There is nothing more to say about it than that it is a location on the map.

Fails WP:GEOLAND, WP:GNG, WP:NOPAGE. I'm agnostic over whether this should be deleted or redirected to Karpno - the name is at least not something that could plausibly be used for something else, and is part of Karpno. On the other hand we should not simply create redirects for every named location in a village. There is no content to merge, though. FOARP (talk) 19:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland. FOARP (talk) 19:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Karpno, Bytów County, which it is a part of. It makes sense to have a redirect and information in the main village that it has a part named such and such, but I am not seeing what makes this pass WP:GNG otherwise. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.