Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kranen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 22:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Kranen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

unnotable since we can't find notable references (everything is self-published) and only a couple of hundred people ever played this game ever, anyway. if this was enough to meet criteria, we'd have as many drinking game articles as we have US town articles. Ysangkok (talk) 10:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Zero references, zero indication of notability, and ability to do that looks very unlikely. North8000 (talk) 11:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep One of the best repositories of information on the game currently in existence, and it would be a shame for it to be lost. The game is notable enough to be discussed in the welcoming materials at both the physics and mathematics departments at University of Copenhagen, so while it may be mostly played people at the faculty of science there, you'd be hard pressed to find someone in that faculty who hasn't played or at least heard of this game. As an additional reference, the game was been mentioned in FAMØS 16-1. In short, an inclusionist vote for keeping it. &int;eb²+1(talk) 23:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Also I think the number of people who have played this game should be counted in thousands and not hundreds, as it has been introduced to alle the new students at mathematics and physics at the university of copenhagen for the last 10-15 years. PoiZaN (talk) 01:09, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - this article has NO references and a thorough Google search indicates that this it is not notable. 11coolguy12 (talk) 08:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Individual university departments themselves are only very rarely considered notable, so basic common sense would indicate that games played only in individual departments should also not be so considered. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.